Sure comments on Mobile Health Review

Sure mobile has urged the Health Minister to complete his review of Mobile Mast Health within the “shortest possible time period.”
The Minister for Health and Social Services has requested that the Planning & Environment Minister withholds all current telephone mast applications whilst a review of existing health policies is undertaken. The Minister for Planning and Environment has therefore decided to suspend the determination of all mast applications to allow the Health Department reasonable time to review the current health advice relating to mobile telephone mast emissions.
Sure, the mobile service from Cable & Wireless, has over 15,000 local customers. Head of PR for Sure mobile in the Channel Islands & Isle of Man, Steve Smith said that the latest review was understandable, but that he believed that masts in Jersey already operate to the highest global safety standards.
He said:
“Cable & Wireless is internationally recognised as a responsible operator which takes public health concerns very seriously and we comply fully with the recommendations of the Stewart report on mobile health.”
In 1999, the British government commissioned a group of independent scientists to look into any health threat from mobile phones. In May 2000 the Stewart Report published its findings that there was no evidence of adverse health effects caused by radio wave radiation. It did though make a number of best practice recommendations for operators. In 2004 the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation supported the Stewart report’s findings.
A three year study was also completed this year by a group of independent scientists at the University of Essex, which tested 44 people who had previously reported symptoms or sensitivity to mobile phone technology, and 114 people who had not reported any health effects. The results showed that the sensitive group reported more symptoms and greater severity of symptoms, as well as higher skin conductance (which is a good measure of physiological response to environmental stressors), regardless of whether the 3G signal was on or off. Hence, the range of symptoms and physiological response did not appear to be related to the presence of either GSM or 3G signals.
Mr Smith added: “Every mast application we make is accompanied by a health certificate in line with the government’s current policy. We have a duty of care to islanders and our engineers which we take extremely seriously and operate all base stations considerably below the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation.”
Cable and Wireless has passed OFCOM audits of its mast emission levels in both Guernsey (2005) and the Isle of Man (2007). The UK’s communications regulator found that the radio masts checked in Guernsey, Alderney, Sark and the Isle of Man fell well within the safety standards established by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection.
Mr Smith said:
“Health concerns are extremely important, but time and again the evidence has pointed to the fact that mobile masts have no adverse health effects. At the same time I’d ask for the Health Minister to consider the desire of mobile users to let the operators enhance their network coverage across the island.”